The Minimum Input,Maximum Output Theorem

So much for the unnecessary language (i'd call "borrowed" english ) i've used in the previous entry,i feel like a fool now.I should have been myself.

And yet another disclaimer before i start this entry...
Henceforth my blog shall contain endless fart on "ME" and "MY" philosophy (my blog so i preach ;) )... often contradictory...........so u decide if u wish to break your head on worthless nonsense or better catch up with the last book you left half-read.
For those who really have time for me..my most humble 'Thank You'...read on..

I'm sure most of you would have guessed what i'm going to talk about now.But anyway here's the abstract idea of the celebrated ( cuz i propounded it ;)) Minimum Input,Maximum Output Theorem
"I want to publish a "great" paper , top my class , excel at sports , make my best paintings , get my favourite clothes , buy all that i want , look good , be the coolest kid on the block , (add whatever you want here) with the global minimum of time AND effort invested on this"

Introducing some technical terms..
I'll call "all that u want"=Success
and "time AND effort"=Investment

Technically stating the theorem again
"Success=e^e^e^e.....(infinite series)..(Investment)"
that'z the Idealistic or General Theory of MIMO..



& the Realistic or Special Theory of MIMO is
"Success=e^Investment"

I have seen a few cases of Special Theory of MIMO.

But there always seem to exist some uneven parameters that make it possible....to name a few.. Intelligence , Smartness , Management Skills , Luck ( i believe this is the parameter that summerizes the rest of them).
These are parameters I do not have control on.Well...,some argue that Praying to God, Getting in tune with 'Nature'(plzz tell me what this means), Relaxing yourself and some endless blah.. blahs...help you set your "Luck" right.Anyway,as of now I have no proofs that these will work,but if find them,i'll revise my argument.
Essentially these parameters are somethings you get by birth,some from your environment,some from your upbringing( again blah blahs).....and again things out of my control.

Given the constraint (worst case scenario) that I do not posses any of these "favouring" parameters....I still want to realise The MIMO Theorem.

It is said that "Nothing is Impossible".
So,is there a way out? If yes,give algo/views.............or is the Above quote (and hence My theorem) *sob* Impossible?
( & for some of the pranksters tempted to comment....I know that Maximum Input Minimum Output (misinterpreted MIMO) is always possible..)